This is what will obviously be part one of a Tancredo expose. Don’t worry, more will come.
Before I go any farther, I want to note that I do not think Congressman Tancredo is an neo-Nazi. He does, though, have some associates with very questionable associated. If you lie down with dogs, you will get up with fleas.
“Tancredo, of course, has claimed that his anti-immigration stances have “nothing to do with ethnicity or race.” Yet his proximity to his white nationalist admirers is closer than he publicly concedes. Perched in the rear of the Dulles Hyatt conference hall sipping a Diet Coke, Gordon Lee Baum, the leader of America’s largest white nationalist organization, the Council of Conservative Citizens, told me, “Tancredo’s pretty good. We’ve had him down a few times to meet with us.” Though Baum didn’t elaborate, another CCC member, California-based anti-immigrant doyenne Barbara Coe, spoke alongside Tancredo at a February 8 rally at the US Capitol in support of the Minutemen.
(To the chagrin of its planners, the rally was attended by two brown-shirted neo-Nazis from the National Socialist Movement who distributed fliers declaring, “Immigration is a race issue” until they were removed by Capitol Police.)
In the midterm election year of 2006 and looking forward to the presidential election of 2008, Tancredo has laid down his marker. If establishment GOP candidates stray from his line, he has threatened to enter the Republican presidential race himself to “force [illegal immigration] into the debate.” Just last month, Tancredo tested the waters (or made clear his threat) with a series of stump speeches in New Hampshire.
Already, a surprising array of Republican presidential contenders are emulating Tancredo. Senator George Allen of Virginia met privately with Tancredo in September to seek his blessing and advice. Tancredo said he came away mildly encouraged. In February, Republican Senate majority leader Bill Frist called for “physical or electronic barriers covering every inch of our 1,951-mile-long border with Mexico–a virtual fence.” And Republican Congresswoman Jean Schmidt, who infamously called decorated Vietnam vet Representative John Murtha a “coward” on the House floor, recently removed a claim from her campaign website that Tancredo had endorsed her after Tancredo’s office said it was false.
While the virulent but minuscule white nationalist movement struggles to find its bearings, certain conservative Republicans are adapting a nativist appeal to gain a broader following. They are applying Nick Griffin’s advice to attack “the enemy we can most easily defeat,” leaving overt anti-Semitism to the likes of David Duke. Meanwhile, they stoke fears of nonwhite immigrants, who Tancredo has said are “coming here to kill you and kill me and our families.” The far right has figured out its post-9/11, post-Bush strategy, and the Republican hopefuls of 2008 are already gravitating toward it. “
Now I don’t know about you, but to me this is pure, unadulterated HATE. So my question is as follows: When are conservatives going to mature enough to call hate – hate and fight it?
Tancredo’s PAC is Team
Cannon fires a volley of his own, linking to the Red State article about Tancredo emerging as a political hack.
I’ve spent the past hour or so surfing and checking links. Funny, but the links that were connecting Tancredo’s PAC to some specific hate groups no longer exist. I thought it was my imagination, but I’ve discovered this web site has the same problem. And it is interesting to note that a REPUBLICAN congressman runs a PAC that is openly supporting candidates to run against established REPUBLICANS.
“Our Winner Has an Achilles’ Heel
Less publicized, and frankly, more tin-foil hattish is Tancredo’s advocacy of making the Constitution’s 14th Amendment more specific to change the notion that it bestows automatic citizenship to children born of illegal aliens in the
Tancredo is so over the top about immigration reform that even supportive colleagues feel the need to employ disclaimers. On the Congressional Immigration Reform Caucus website just such a disclaimer was recently attached to a “report” by Tancredo praising citizen border patrol group the Minutemen. Tancredo’s commentary, the website says, “does not necessarily represent the views of the Immigration Reform Caucus or any of its members.”
Tancredo says he’s noticed an increase in the volume and furor of groups seeking to halt progress to restrict legal and illegal immigration. Such groups have been active in promoting the perception that any attempt to control immigration amounts to a ‘shoot the dirty Mexican’ policy. In response, Tancredo released a statement in early October 2005 that “the immigration issue has nothing to do with race, ethnicity, religion, or country of origin insofar as I am concerned.”
As activists love to point out, it’s interesting to note that Tancredo and Co. don’t seem nearly as fired up over protecting Vermont and Maine from French-speaking maple syrup tappers. If Tancredo is serious about running in 2008 and needs a strategy to ward off charges of racism while he’s busy exploiting white fear, his northern border states strategy may change.”
“In addition, FAIR’s political action committee, theThe way I judge people is through my friend Lindsey. I think I’ve repeatedly mentioned that Lindsey is probably one of the the most decent and honorable men to ever serve in Washington. When Tancredo disses him, that tells me all I need to know.
He has been identified as the most zenophobic and ‘racist’ member of Congress by the ADL. And, he personally sand-bagged GWB’s 2005 immigration reform. Yep, you heard me correctly.
And the SPLC is liberal, I know that -but we’re going for intellectual honesty here – and in the anti-illegal hystaria being whipped into a feeding frenzy by Tancredo and his compatriots, we are in great need of it.
A 2005 New Republic profile of Tancredo. And exposes Tancredo’s agenda in terms I have been using. “…This would be just a story about a rabidly self-promotional representative were it not for the signs that Tancredo is helping to whip up a new xenophobia on the GOP right, with both short-term and long-term implications. In the near term, Tancredo’s crusade threatens to block the sweeping immigration reform that is one of Bush’s biggest second-term initiatives. At the same time, he’s already looking past this lame-duck president and toward the 2008 presidential campaign. Having recently visited New Hampshire–and with plans to tour Iowa this spring–Tancredo is determined to make his laments about “the cult of multiculturalism” a central issue in the 2008 Republican primaries, even if it means a quixotic single-issue candidacy of his own. If he succeeds, Tancredo could set back by decades Rove’s dream of a pro-GOP Latino America. Just when Republicans thought they had exorcised the ghost of Pat Buchanan, he’s back. And he knows all the cable bookers in town…”
“…Last year, the Republicans in Tancredo’s caucus nearly managed to derail an intelligence reform bill with strong White House backing, risking severe embarrassment to the president. Bush briefly placated the anti-immigrant conservatives with promises of new border-enforcement measures…”
A review of Tancredo’s role-model, Samuel Huntington’s book that has inspired Tancredo’s zenophobia. And a Texas critique of the book that highlights the many mis-reprensations of the Hispanic culture.
“Tanton and his groups also have close ties to Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-CO), a leading supporter of stricter immigration rules, including a FAIR-supported five-year moratorium on many forms of legal immigration [The Washington Post, 3/25/05]. The Capitol Hill newspaper Roll Call described NumbersUSA legislative analyst Rosemary Jenks as “a close Tancredo ally in the immigration reform movement” [1/12/04]. A 2003 Salon.com article (written by Max Blumenthal, now a Media Matters research fellow) also noted Tancredo’s extensive connections to both Tanton and white nationalist activists:
Tancredo also enjoys star status among the white-collar anti-immigrationists of Tanton’s network who have courted his support, donating $5,000 to his 2002 campaign through FAIR’s U.S. Immigration Reform PAC and thousands more in personal donations. Leaders in Tanton’s network have long sought a foothold on Capitol Hill and, through Tancredo, it appears their hopes have been realized.
The close working relationship between the Tanton network and Tancredo is most apparent on the Web site for the congressman’s Immigration Reform Caucus. When Salon interviewed Tancredo earlier this year, the Web site contained links to FAIR, NumbersUSA, CIS and virtually every other Tanton creation. It also contained a link to VDare, a white nationalist Web site run by British writer Peter Brimelow that is named after Virginia Dare, the first white child born in the New World. When asked about the link, Tancredo was befuddled and indignant.
After the Salon.com article’s publication, Tancredo scrubbed all links to outside groups from the caucus’ website, though he wrote in a letter to Salon.com: “I had no reason to believe that this online magazine is anything but a legitimate contributor to the vast library of resources on this vital issue. After looking over Vdare’s recent work, I have not changed this opinion.”
At least one GOP Congressperson has suggested Tancredo recant his support of Gilchrist or be booted out of the party!
September 29, 2005
Darrell Issa: Tancredo Should Recant Gilchrist Endorsement Or Be Tossed from GOP
This story from Congress Daily this morning:
POLITICS – Issa Challenges Tancredo On Support For Third-Party Candidate
by Mark Wegner
© National Journal Group, Inc.
Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., said he would urge that Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., be thrown out of the Republican Party if he continues backing a third-party candidate in the special election for California’s 48th District.
“I would ask the state of Colorado to strip him of his party membership,” Issa said in an interview.
Tancredo has endorsed and appeared in a cable television ad for American Independent Party candidate Jim Gilchrist, who is running in the Oct. 4 open primary to replace former Rep. Christopher Cox, R-Calif., who is now SEC chairman.
Issa said Tancredo, a vocal immigration critic, could have chosen to endorse any one of 10 Republicans in the race.
Gilchrist, an anti-immigration activist, is the founder of the Minuteman Project, which monitors the U.S.-Mexico border for illegal immigrants.
“Gilchrist is a single-issue candidate with no chance of winning,” Issa said.
Issa confirmed he publicly raised his objections to Tancredo’s endorsement in the weekly House Republican Conference meeting Wednesday. He distributed a flyer about Tancredo’s endorsement and a story that appeared Tuesday in CongressDailyPM.
Tancredo defended himself at the Conference meeting by noting Republicans had embraced Virginia Rep. Virgil Goode, a former Democrat who remained an independent before eventually running as a Republican.
A Tancredo spokesman said Tancredo is a “lifelong Republican” who has won repeated elections in Colorado, and said it was “silly” for Issa to issue threats about revoking his party membership.
The spokesman noted Gilchrist wanted to run as a Republican, but state law would not allow him to change his party affiliation to the GOP in time for the special election. Gilchrist sent a letter Monday to House Speaker Hastert offering to caucus with Republicans if he is elected.
“He is going to caucus with Republicans and he is for all intents and purposes a Republican,” the Tancredo spokesman said.
The spokesman added Tancredo has not committed to supporting Gilchrist in any runoff.
“I think that is an open question. We haven’t made any decision right now,” he said.
Republican state Sen. John Campbell is considered the frontrunner in next week’s open primary, but he must win over 50 percent of the vote to avoid a Dec. 6 runoff.
Campbell, who faces significant GOP opposition from former state Assemblywoman Marilyn Brewer, would advance to the runoff if he captures more votes than any other GOP candidate.
Issa has endorsed Campbell and said he is confident Campbell will eventually be elected to Congress.
“He is so far ahead. There’s really only a question about whether he gets 51 percent or not,” Issa said.”
2 Comments
Ah great pieces on both your blogs. I just don’t get it. Why is the media that goes after the Republicans for every imaganed wrong giving Tancredo and others such a big damn pass. Its so apparent to that it has to be intentional. I am sure Hispanic lobby groups and others are feeding this info to cnn , msnbc, fox, cbs etc etc.
I have a huge feeling that the media is setting us up for a huge fall. They want Tancredo and others to get influence so then they can slam the whole party later when they get into power. Then it will be unleased. I just can’t think of another reason why the MSM is not doing it.
Oh I forgot to give you this link to a disscusion thread I know you would love
http://www.alipac.us/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&t=29474
Alipac is some kind of forum. You should look around that place
Post a Comment